Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  37 / 348 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 37 / 348 Next Page
Page Background

1

Group Profile | Businesses |

Litigation

| Risk Factors

Actions Related to the ICMS Tax

GVT, like all other telecommunications operators, is party in several

Brazilian States to various proceedings concerning the application of the

“ICMS” tax (

Imposto Sober Circulação de Mercadorias e Prestação de

Serviços

), which is a tax on operations relating to the circulation of goods

and the supply of transport, communication and electricity services.

GVT is notably a party to litigation in various Brazilian States concerning

the application of the ICMS tax on voice telecommunication services.

GVT argues that the ICMS tax should not apply to monthly plans. Of the

21 proceedings initiated by GVT, all have resulted in decisions favorable

to GVT and 12 are no longer subject to appeal.

Actions Related to the FUST and FUNTTEL Taxes in Brazil

The Brazilian tax authorities argue that the assessment of the

taxes known as “FUST” (Fundo da Universalização dos Serviços

de Telecomunicações), a federal tax to promote the supply of

telecommunications services throughout the whole Brazilian territory,

including in areas that are not economically viable, and “FUNTTEL”

(

Fundo para Desenvolvimento Tecnológioco das Telecomunicações

),

a federal tax to finance technological investments in Brazilian

telecommunications services, should be based on the company’s gross

revenue without deduction for price reductions or interconnection

expenses and other taxes, which would lead to part of that sum being

subject to double taxation. GVT is challenging this interpretation and

has secured a suspension of payment of the sums claimed by the tax

authority from the federal judge.

Proceedings Brought against

Telecommunications Operators in Brazil

Regarding the Application of the PIS and COFINS taxes

Several proceedings were initiated against all the telecommunications

operators in Brazil, including GVT, seeking to prevent invoices from

being increased by taxes known as “PIS” (

Programa de Integração

Social

) and “COFINS” (

Contribuição para Financiamento da Seguridade

Social

), which are federal taxes that apply to revenue from the provision

of telecommunications services. GVT believes that the arguments in its

defense have a stronger basis than those of the historic operators i as

GVT operates pursuant to a more flexible license that allows it to set its

own tariffs.

37

Annual Report 2014