Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  189 / 348 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 189 / 348 Next Page
Page Background

4

Section 6 - Litigation

Financial Report

| Statutory Auditors’ Report on the Consolidated Financial Statements | Consolidated

Financial Statements | Statutory Auditors’ Report on the Financial Statements | Statutory Financial Statements

Capitol Records and EMI Music Publishing

against MP3tunes

On November 9, 2007, Capitol Records and EMI Music Publishing filed a

joint complaint against MP3Tunes and its founder, Michael Robertson,

for copyright infringement on the sideload.com and mp3tunes.com

websites. The trial was held in March 2014, and, on March 19, 2014, the

jury returned a verdict favorable to EMI and Capital Records. It found the

defendants liable for knowingly allowing the unauthorized content on the

websites. On March 26, 2014, the jury awarded damages in the amount

of $41 million. On October 30, 2014 the Court confirmed the verdict but

entered judgment in the reduced amount of $12.2 million. The defendants

have appealed against the judgment.

Mireille Porte against Interscope Records, Inc.,

Stefani Germanotta and Universal Music France

On July 11, 2013, the artist Mireille Porte (AKA “Orlan”) filed a complaint

against Interscope Records, Inc., Stefani Germanotta (AKA “Lady

Gaga”) and Universal Music France with the Paris Tribunal of First

Instance (

Tribunal de Grande Instance de Paris

) for the alleged copyright

infringement of several of Orlan’s artistic works.

James Clar against Rihanna Fenty, UMG Recordings,

Inc. and Universal Music France

On June 13, 2014, the artist James Clar filed a complaint against Rihanna

Fenty, UMG Recordings, Inc. and Universal Music France before the Paris

Tribunal of First Instance (

Tribunal de Grande Instance de Paris

) for the

alleged infringement of his work.

Litigation involving GVT (discontinued operation)

Actions related to the ICMS Tax

GVT, like all other telecommunications operators, is party in several

Brazilian States to various proceedings concerning the application of the

“ICMS” tax (

Imposto Sober Circulação de Mercadorias e Prestação de

Serviços

), which is a tax on operations relating to the circulation of goods

and the supply of transport, communication and electricity services.

GVT is notably a party to litigation in various Brazilian States concerning

the application of the ICMS tax on voice telecommunication services. GVT

argues that the ICMS tax should not apply to monthly plans. Of the 21

proceedings initiated by GVT, all have resulted in decisions favorable to

GVT and 12 are no longer subject to appeal.

Actions related to the FUST

and FUNTTEL taxes in Brazil

The Brazilian tax authorities argue that the assessment of the

taxes known as “FUST” (

Fundo da Universalização dos Serviços

de Telecomunicações

), a federal tax to promote the supply of

telecommunications services throughout the whole Brazilian territory,

including in areas that are not economically viable, and “FUNTTEL”

(

Fundo para Desenvolvimento Tecnológioco das Telecomunicações

),

a federal tax to finance technological investments in Brazilian

telecommunications services, should be based on the company’s gross

revenue without deduction for price reductions or interconnection

expenses and other taxes, which would lead to part of that sum being

subject to double taxation. GVT is challenging this interpretation and

has secured a suspension of payment of the sums claimed by the tax

authority from the federal judge.

Proceedings brought against telecommunications

operators in Brazil regarding the application

of the PIS and COFINS taxes

Several proceedings were initiated against all the telecommunications

operators in Brazil, including GVT, seeking to prevent invoices from

being increased by taxes known as “PIS” (Programa de Integração

Social) and “COFINS” (Contribuição para Financiamento da Seguridade

Social), which are federal taxes that apply to revenue from the provision

of telecommunications services. GVT believes that the arguments in its

defense have a stronger basis than those of the historic operators as

GVT operates pursuant to a more flexible license that allows it to set its

own tariffs.

189

Annual Report 2014